What CIOs Need to Know in 2025

For many CIOs, low-code development seems like a magic shortcut: faster delivery, lower costs, and empowering non-tech users. But like any powerful tool, this tool also has consequences.

In this article, we will dig deeper low code development pros and cons from a leadership perspective, and help you decide how (and when) to implement them wisely.

1. What is Low Code? Quick Guide

A low code development platform (LCDP) provides a visual, model-driven environment for building applications with minimal hand coding. You typically work with drag-and-drop building blocks, visual workflows, and built-in modules. For parts that require special logic or complexity, you can “drop” them into the code.

Low code aims to bridge the gap between full custom development and visual tools, enabling faster delivery without sacrificing extensibility.

2. Why CIOs Are Interested in Low Code

Here are some of the pressures and opportunities that are driving CIOs to consider low code:

• Developer shortage & backlog pressure: With increasing demand and limited engineering capacity, low code helps expand development capacity.
• Faster time to market: Business units expect rapid iteration; low code helps streamline the turnaround.
• Business agility & responsiveness: Being able to pivot or adapt more quickly is a competitive advantage.
• Cost efficiency & resource optimization: Less manual coding, possibly less specialist hiring.
• Empower domain developers or citizens: Let business teams build or prototype quickly, lightening the burden on IT.
• Platform standardization & consistency: Using a controlled, low-code platform can help unify delivery standards across projects.

But these advantages come with serious consequences. You as a CIO must be vigilant.

3. Advantages of Low Code Development

Here are the main advantages that low-code offers, especially from a CIO/leadership perspective:

Profit	Why This Matters for CIOs/Enterprises
Speed/Fast Delivery	Low code can speed up the development cycle significantly. Many platforms allow you to build a feature or MVP in days instead of weeks.
Reduced Resource Usage & Cost Efficiency	Reduce dependency on large development teams for routine features. More component reuse and less boilerplate work.
Better Collaboration Between IT & Business	Non-technical stakeholders or domain experts can prototype or transition requirements themselves. This reduces translation gaps.
Lower Maintenance Overhead (in some cases)	Platform vendors handle updates, infrastructure, security patches, frameworks, etc., which can ease the maintenance burden.
Standardization & Consistency	Because some applications use the same underlying components, the UI/UX and architecture tend to be more consistent across the enterprise.
Reducing the Risk of “Reinventing the Wheel”	Many common patterns, integrations, and modules are pre-built, reducing custom errors.

These professionals are powerful motivators — but that doesn’t mean low code is perfect.

4. ⚠ Cons & Risks CIOs Must Understand

Low code has its drawbacks, and you need to keep your eyes open. Here are the key weaknesses and risks, with strategic context:

Challenges / Risks	Why This Matters	Mitigation / Things to Pay Attention to
Limited Customization & Flexibility	Some unique business logic, performance optimizations, or UX requirements may not be expressible within the constraints of the platform.	Evaluate the extensibility of the platform, ensuring the ability to “override” or insert custom code paths
Scalability & Performance Bottlenecks	As applications grow, abstraction layers can introduce inefficiencies, latencies, or resource constraints.	Test at scale, test performance early, monitor and plan architectural exit paths
Vendor Lock-in / Migration Difficulty	Many platforms are proprietary; moving or migrating logic later can be expensive or even impossible.	Choose a platform with export capabilities, open APIs, and minimal black box locks
Security, Compliance & Governance Gaps	Because things are overlooked, you may lose visibility or control over security, data access, audit trails, and compliance.	Require security reviews, demanding audit logs, encryption, role-based access, and compliance certification
IT Shadow & Application Deployment	Empowering non-technical users can result in many small applications popping up uncontrollably, leading to duplication, data fragmentation, and maintenance chaos.	Define governance, approval gateways, centralized oversight, sandbox environment
Debt Complexity & Technical Maintenance	As custom logic grows, low-code applications may become brittle, difficult to refactor, or inconsistent in structure.	Implement version control, periodic refactoring, code reviews, and modular design
Costs on a Large Scale	Licensing, user fees, or platform prices per user may increase, especially if many applications or users rely on them.	Estimate total cost of ownership (TCO), negotiate enterprise pricing, monitor usage
Skills Misalignment	Teams may think “low code means no development skills required” — but success requires good architecture, integration understanding, and governance discipline.	Ensure training, alignment with development standards, rigorous reviews

Understanding these weaknesses helps you plan mitigations in advance rather than experiencing surprises later.

5. When Low Code Makes Sense — and When It Doesn’t

Low code is not universally suitable. Here are the scenario guidelines from a CIO’s perspective:

Good Use Cases (Low Risk, High Reward)

• Internal tools, admin dashboard, workflow automation
• Prototyping/MVP creation to validate ideas
• Medium complexity line of business applications
• Non-critical modules or proof-of-concept features
• A situation with a clear improvement path or future delivery

Use Cases to Avoid (High Risk)

• Critical core systems with strict performance or security requirements
• Applications that require deep custom business logic, algorithms, or real-time constraints
• Very high scale systems (e.g. millions of concurrent users)
• Where the risk of vendor lock-in is unacceptable
• Legacy systems that require deep integration, special adapters, or unusual patterns

The best point is that the application is complex enough, but not so specialized that low code becomes an obstacle.

6. Governance, Best Practices & Mistakes to Avoid

To make low-code adoption safe and scalable, here are the best practices and governance mechanisms that CIOs should implement:

1. Set clear boundaries & use policies
   Determine which applications can use low code, which must be traditional, data access limits, etc.
2. Central oversight & IT sponsorship
   Make sure IT is involved, even if the business unit is leading the implementation, to avoid duplication and conflict.
3. Component/template library
   Provide shared and approved modules so that each team doesn’t reinvent similar functionality.
4. Review & audit gates
   Before deployment, run code reviews, security audits, performance checks, and compliance reviews.
5. Version control, environment promotion & rollback strategy
6. Monitoring, recording & observation
   Even though the logic is abstracted, it requires logs, metrics, error tracking, and dashboards to monitor health.
7. Training & empowerment
   Train the team on platform best practices, data modeling, security, integration.
8. Exit strategy
   Always have a plan to refactor or migrate from low code when growth puts pressure on demand.
9. Hybrid architectural approach
   Use low code for front-end/UI/workflow, and traditional code for backend or complex logic.
10. Cost monitoring
    Monitor license usage, user growth, and platform consumption to avoid out-of-control costs.

Following this will help prevent low-code from turning into a technical debt mess or a governance nightmare.

7. Real World Examples & Lessons

Here are some illustrative lessons (anonymized or taken from public articles) on basic theory:

• One CIO I spoke to was piloting low code for an internal reporting dashboard. They saved months of development time, but then discovered scaling problems when usage spiked. They had to migrate some of the logic to custom microservices.
• Large companies that adopt low code often start with a set of departments under close supervision, then gradually expand the scope — so that culture and governance can evolve.
• Some organizations experienced security incidents because business users inadvertently exposed data through citizen-built low-code applications that lacked proper access checks.

This lesson illustrates the importance of combining agility and alertness.

8. Strategic Recommendations for CIOs

To make low-code a success rather than a risk, here is a strategic blueprint:

1. Start with the pilot
   Choose low-risk projects to test, learn, and improve governance.
2. Benchmarks & sizes
   Track metrics: time savings, costs, error rates, usage, refactoring efforts.
3. Adopt a center of excellence (CoE)
   Build a small team that supports, organizes, and manages the use of low code across the organization.
4. Enforce standards & platform selection criteria
   Evaluate prospective low-code platforms for extensibility, security, exportability, and governance features.
5. Foster collaboration between IT and business
   Business and IT must have the same roadmap, not both in their own right.
6. Plan evolution
   Expect to refactor or migrate parts of low-code applications into code as demand increases. Design with modularity.
7. Review costs continuously
   Monitor license usage, cost per user, and platform scaling costs.
8. Promote architectural literacy
   Even low-code teams need to understand data modeling, APIs, performance patterns.

9. Conclusion & Next Steps

🧠 Important Points

• Low code offers real advantages: speed, cost savings, efficiency, collaboration—but it’s not magic.
• That low code development pros and cons must be fully understood before large-scale adoption.
• CIOs must lead with governance, oversight, pilot programs, and architectural discipline.
• The right approach often combines low code for specific use cases and traditional development that requires deep control or scale.

Additional Resources: